5) Section 41A(6) for the words „section 29, paragraph 1) to „jointly,“ „Section 29 of this Act for the granting of a new lease, it may order the grant to the tenants of the business or to the tenants of the company.“ In its 1992 report, the Commission concluded that the new provision had failed to achieve its objective of creating an effective filter to avoid misuse of the form generally adopted as the dominant position of the lessor. As a general rule, courts approve agreements without actually considering the circumstances of the notification.  While the Board recognized the importance of safeguards to ensure that the potential tenant is only compliant with the contract if he understands the nature of the legal rights he waives, it has concluded that this objective could be achieved more effectively without the formality, delay or cost of a legal application. If a landlord and tenant wish to enter into an enforceable contract for the abandonment of a tenancy agreement protected by the Landlord and Tenants Act 1954, they must first follow the contracting procedure authorized by that law. The tenant offers to enter into a tenancy agreement; We will review the theme of these proposed procedures later in the report.  But first, we discuss the government`s proposals on capitulations. We believe that the requirement for a declaration is necessary to ensure that the tenant is protected. The argument that tenants who have not considered the content of an application are unlikely to pay more attention when inviting them to sign such a statement are not persuasive. We believe that it is entirely possible that a tenant does not understand the importance of a document, the „health alert,“ within that package, given a large set of documents relating to a proposed tenancy agreement. In particular, an unrepresented tenant could easily be persuaded by an unscrupulous landlord that such communication is perfectly routine and of little importance. Even if this is not the case, the tenant cannot recognize the importance of the notice. The requirement to sign a statement that he read the notice and accepted the consequences of the agreement would help ensure that its importance to the tenant is not lost. With respect to the department`s argument (mentioned above, point 45), to require the tenant to sign a declaration in a case where the delay of at least 14 days is announced, we note that the tenant must sign a legal declaration as a result of the department`s proposal (in a case where the minimum 14-day period is not disclosed) that he has received the notification and that he has accepted the consequences of the conclusion of the contract; and a reference to the notice and declaration should be included or approved in the lease.